Residential Appraising in a Declining Market

As we are all well aware, residential real estate prices have been in a general decline for several years. By now most appraisers have become accustomed to appraising in a declining market. But what constitutes a declining market? How does an appraiser define it? And what is required to arrive at the best possible value faced with this type of market? These questions and many others have been addressed in an advisory released by the Appraisal Practices Board (APB) on May 7, 2012. The APB is the Appraisal Foundation’s newest board, established in July 2010, and is responsible for developing voluntary guidance in the form of Recognized Valuation Methods & Techniques.

Below are a few excerpts I found interesting, but I recommend that you read the entire document as it addresses eight main questions related to appraising in a declining market. Remember, the guidance in the document is voluntary. But it is great advice offered by a panel of expert appraisers and produced to give you various options for successfully completing your assignments. The Board’s goal is to provide additional guidance and information on generally accepted methods and techniques used to solve very real appraisal challenges.

The first question the APB tackles is a very useful one that addresses a core issue: How should an appraiser define a declining market? The board provides the following guidance:

When providing residential appraisal services, appraisers may be required to determine what constitutes a declining market in order to produce credible assignment results. When determining the status of a market, issues of concern include the following:

  • Currently, there is no single, commonly-accepted definition of a declining market.
  • How are “normal” increases and decreases in the market (caused by seasonal differences or temporary over or undersupply of inventory) considered when determining the status of a market? How are those seasonal market movements differentiated from a declining market trend?
  • Should an appraiser declare the subject to be in a declining market if, for example, the median price in the market falls for one quarter, or would the median price (in this example) need to fall for two or three quarters before calling the market declining?
  • When an appraiser indicates that values are declining, does that mean they are declining as of the effective date of the appraisal, or does it imply prices will decline in some future time period?
  • Recognizing the characteristics of a declining market – Most appraisers can identify the indicators of a declining market. However, many have trouble interpreting the indicators and then deciding when the indicators lead to a conclusive identification of a declining market. Some characteristics of a declining market are as follows:

  • Oversupply of competing properties (i.e., demand and supply are out of balance).
  • Extended marketing times for active, pending and closed sales.
  • Prior listings of the subject that reflect list prices notably higher than the current contract, sale price or value.
  • Prior sales of the subject and/or comparables that reflect higher prices than current prices.
  • Decrease in sale prices as a percent of list prices.
  • Increase in REO listings in neighborhood.
  • In most cases, one of these characteristics alone is not an indication of a declining market, but the presence of several indicators may be a strong indication that the market is in decline.

    Defining a declining market – It could be said that all markets are increasing if you go back in history far enough. If an appraiser looks only at the last two quarters, would this be a reasonable time period to say whether prices are going up or down? Would it be better to say in the last 90 days? Would it be better to analyze and read the current market on an annual basis because of the impact of normal seasonal differences?

    It is quite logical to say “Declining; compared to what?” It is important for an appraiser to not only state whether they believe the market for the subject is increasing, decreasing or in balance, and to also state what baseline was utilized to arrive at that conclusion. The appraiser should tell the intended users what the comparison is based on (e.g., “The subject’s market is considered to be increasing compared to the same market a year ago,” or “This market is considered to be declining because the database shows a decline in median prices for three out of four quarters in the last year.”)

    Just stating “increasing,” “declining” or “stable” without commenting on the time period covered is inadequate.


    One recurring theme throughout the advisory document is that of an appraiser’s definition of market value. Question #3 asks: What are some Alternative Value Definitions? This section also addresses questions about using distressed sale properties as comps. Here is an excerpt from their full answer that will be useful to keep in mind:


    Market Value: The Public Perception – It is important to understand that most real estate owners, lenders, investors and government officials believe that the term “market value” reflects a gross sale price that an owner of the subject would receive if the subject were put on the market as of the effective date of appraisal. This assumes exposure time has already occurred. However, it is widely recognized (including in USPAP) that market value definitions assume a hypothetical sale of the property as of the date of the appraisal according to the standards of the definition of market value utilized in the appraisal.

    In most definitions, market value assumes a sale to the most probable buyer within the highest and best use opinion. This means the definition of the term is based on a sale from the current owner to a new owner. When an appraiser is asked for a “Market Value Opinion,” the public perception would be that the appraiser will tell the client how much they can sell it for. If so, this necessitates an understanding by the appraiser and the client that the value is a future value. This also necessitates an opinion of “the most probable type of buyer.”

    Because comparable sales are used to develop opinions of market value, the comparable sales must be compliant with the defined value or be adjusted to those requirements. There are many parts to the popular definitions of market value including the condition that “buyer and seller are typically motivated.” Some appraisers consider that this condition in the defined value precludes using comparable sales that were bank owned properties, short sales, or even corporate relocations. While this may be possible in some markets, this cannot be done in many other markets. There are markets where nearly all sales are bank-owned, short sales or other financially distressed sellers. To say these are excluded fails in two ways:

  • It precludes doing any market value appraisal in these markets with nearly all bank owned properties sales unless significant adjustments are made to bring the sales up to a perceived level where the “normal market” would be. The ambiguity of the term “normal market” leaves too much room for debate; and
  • It ignores the public and institutional perception of the words “Market Value.” These terms are seldom argued by people outside the appraisal profession. They are assumed to mean that the value opinion is the amount an appraiser thinks a property would have sold for on the effective date of appraisal.
  • This is why communication with the client about the intended use and scope of work is important to ensure the appraiser does not answer the wrong question.

    Finally, here is a list of items to keep in mind when appraising during a period of declining markets:

  • It is incumbent on the appraiser to develop or adopt a supported definition for a declining market, and to support a conclusion of that decline in his or her appraisal;
  • Several sources of data are available to support conclusions of declining values;
  • In addition to market value, numerous definitions of value exist; one or more of these other definitions may better describe the nature of competitive transactions in the relevant marketplace and meet the client’s needs;
  • The market area may be more relevant for the collection and analysis of trend data;
  • Verification with one or more of the parties to the transaction will be needed to understand the motivations of market participants and to enable forming a conclusion of the likely buyer type as a subset of the highest and best use conclusion; this in turn influences the selection of the value definition (in conjunction with communication with the client), which in turn guides the selection of comparable transactions;
  • Supported adjustments should be made where necessary for condition-of-sale adjustments in declining markets; and
  • Statistical methods may offer a way to support a variety of adjustments.

  • This is all good advice and probably matches what many appraisers are doing today in the face of declining markets. It is good to see the APB logic laid out in such an organized way, so appraisers can look at what they are doing today and identify areas where they may want to fine-tune their practice.

    The content expressed in Collateral Vision consists of the opinions of its contributors and does not necessarily
    reflect the opinions or official positions of FNC, Inc., its parent company, subsidiaries, or affiliates.

    This entry was posted in Appraising and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.